Papalote Creek II
RWESan Patricio CountyERCOT
EIA's May 2026 inventory dates the aggregate wind-generator record to December 2010. A historical 18-year LCRA power-purchase agreement became the subject of federal appellate litigation; it is retained as a historical contract rather than a statement of current offtake.
EIA inventory for Sep 2026
Fifth Circuit opinion
EIA plant 57212 · Inventory for Sep 2026.
| Generator | Technology | Status | Power (MW) | Energy (MWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Onshore Wind Turbine | Operating | 200.1 | Unknown |
Similar plants ranked by technology, capacity, and distance.
Current generator records and technology attributes reported through EIA-860.
| Generator | Capacity | Technology | Operation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 200.1 MW 200.1 MW summer | Onshore Wind Turbine WT | Dec 2010 | Operating |
Monthly EIA generation history and recent market-resource behavior where linked telemetry is available.
Deterministic links to ERCOT market resources, price records, outage disclosures, queue records, and nearby infrastructure. Candidate joins remain labeled until corroborated.
Source-backed project transactions, agreements, land records, permits, and environmental disclosures. Portfolio and adjacent-project facts remain explicitly scoped.
Parties, market resources, and identifiers tied to this asset, with owner, operator, developer, EPC, compliance provider, and interconnecting entity roles kept separate.
Drag organizations to explore the network. Select a node to pin its details and available page link.
Project milestones and public references behind the asset profile.
The later federal opinion describes the 18-year agreement.
Monthly generation is reported through EIA-923. Capacity factor uses the current EIA nameplate capacity and is shown only for complete calendar years.
1 ERCOT market resource · Wind
Capacity factor is average output vs. this plant's observed peak.
Observed ERCOT settlement prices at COTTON_PAP2 over 365 days (2025-10-26 to 2026-10-25).
The TB2 figure is a price benchmark, not revenue: it values one perfect-foresight cycle per day between the 2 cheapest and 2 dearest hours of each day, gross of round-trip losses, and excludes ancillary services and any physical dispatch constraint. It describes what this node’s price shape was worth over the window — it is not this asset’s realized capture, and no dispatch is assumed or modelled.
| Largest reported plants | Capacity | State | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bright Arrow Solar, LLC | 403.6 MW | TX | |
| Cartwheel 1 - Storage, LLC | 300 MW | TX | |
| Peregrine Solar | 300 MW | TX | |
| Fifth Standard Solar PV, LLC (Hybrid) | 287 MW | CA | |
| Radfords Run Wind Farm | 278 MW | IL | |
| Emily Solar, LLC | 273.6 MW | IL | |
| Pyron Wind Farm LLC Hybrid | 258.9 MW | TX | |
| Copper Mountain Solar 3 | 255 MW | NV |
Portfolio membership follows the latest EIA-860 reporting entity. It does not imply ultimate ownership.
View full reporting portfolioEIA dates the operating generator to December 2010.
ERCOT SCED disclosure is delayed, so plant performance windows end at the latest disclosed interval.
Answered from the published record above. Questions whose inputs this profile does not carry are omitted rather than estimated.
Papalote Creek II reports 200.1 MW wind of operating nameplate capacity. These technology ratings do not establish a common export limit. Source: EIA Sep 2026.
Papalote Creek II is a Onshore Wind Turbine facility in San Patricio County, TX, participating in the ERCOT market.
Papalote Creek II is in San Patricio County, TX, inside the ERCOT balancing area.
Papalote Creek II is operated by RWE Americas, LLC according to the EIA generator inventory. Reporting membership does not by itself establish ultimate ownership.
Papalote Creek II reported 459.1 GWh over the twelve months to 2026-07. Figures are net generation as filed to EIA-923.
Papalote Creek II settles at COTTON_PAP2.
By capacity, Papalote Creek II ranks #278 of 1,374 operating plants of the same technology nationally. It ranks #94 of 230 in TX.
Plants within 25 km, nearest first, regardless of technology. Proximity is straight-line distance between mapped plant coordinates; it does not by itself establish a shared point of interconnection.
