King Mountain Wind Ranch 1
NextEra Energy ResourcesUpton County
King Mountain Wind Ranch is an early utility-scale wind project in Upton County, Texas. EIA's May 2026 inventory reports one 278 MW operating generator under Plant ID 55581; Cielo Wind rates the full project at 279 MW. Cielo reports commercial operation in December 2001, 214 Bonus Energy 1.3 MW turbines, four 138 kV substations, and an 18.3-mile transmission line. NextEra Energy Resources is the majority owner.
EIA May 2026
Cielo Wind
Cielo Wind
Cielo Wind affiliate
EIA plant 55581 · Inventory for Sep 2026.
| Generator | Technology | Status | Power (MW) | Energy (MWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXIS | Onshore Wind Turbine | Operating | 278 | Unknown |
Similar plants ranked by technology, capacity, and distance.
Current generator records and technology attributes reported through EIA-860.
| Generator | Capacity | Technology | Operation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXIS | 278 MW 278 MW summer | Onshore Wind Turbine WT | Jun 2001 | Operating |
Monthly EIA generation history and recent market-resource behavior where linked telemetry is available.
Deterministic links to ERCOT market resources, price records, outage disclosures, queue records, and nearby infrastructure. Candidate joins remain labeled until corroborated.
Source-backed project transactions, agreements, land records, permits, and environmental disclosures. Portfolio and adjacent-project facts remain explicitly scoped.
Parties, market resources, and identifiers tied to this asset, with owner, operator, developer, EPC, compliance provider, and interconnecting entity roles kept separate.
Drag organizations to explore the network. Select a node to pin its details and available page link.
Project milestones and public references behind the asset profile.
EIA-860 lists generator EXIS with this operating date.
Monthly generation is reported through EIA-923. Capacity factor uses the current EIA nameplate capacity and is shown only for complete calendar years.
4 ERCOT market resources · Wind
Capacity factor is average output vs. this plant's observed peak.
Observed ERCOT settlement prices at KINGE_ALL over 365 days (2025-10-27 to 2026-10-26). This plant is also crosswalked to KINGW_ALL, KING_KINGNE, KING_KINGNW, KING_KINGSE, KING_KINGSW; the point with the deepest price history is shown.
The TB2 figure is a price benchmark, not revenue: it values one perfect-foresight cycle per day between the 2 cheapest and 2 dearest hours of each day, gross of round-trip losses, and excludes ancillary services and any physical dispatch constraint. It describes what this node’s price shape was worth over the window — it is not this asset’s realized capture, and no dispatch is assumed or modelled.
Portfolio membership follows the latest EIA-860 reporting entity. It does not imply ultimate ownership.
Cielo Wind reports December 2001 commercial operation.
ERCOT SCED disclosure is delayed, so plant performance windows end at the latest disclosed interval.
Answered from the published record above. Questions whose inputs this profile does not carry are omitted rather than estimated.
King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 reports 278 MW wind of operating nameplate capacity. These technology ratings do not establish a common export limit. Source: EIA Sep 2026.
King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 is a Onshore Wind Turbine facility in Upton County, TX, participating in the ERCOT market.
King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 is in Upton County, TX, inside the ERCOT balancing area.
King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 is operated by FPL Energy Upton Wind LP according to the EIA generator inventory. Reporting membership does not by itself establish ultimate ownership.
King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 reported 649.8 GWh over the twelve months to 2026-07. Figures are net generation as filed to EIA-923.
King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 settles at KINGE_ALL.
By capacity, King Mountain Wind Ranch 1 ranks #118 of 1,374 operating plants of the same technology nationally. It ranks #39 of 230 in TX.
Plants within 25 km, nearest first, regardless of technology. Proximity is straight-line distance between mapped plant coordinates; it does not by itself establish a shared point of interconnection.
