The facility comprises a 123 MW standalone combustion turbine placed into service in May 1995, and a jointly owned combined-cycle block constructed in 2001 consisting of two combustion turbines (180 MW and 181 MW), two heat-recovery steam generators, and one steam turbine (206.5 MW).
Mapped infrastructure geometry associated with this asset.
EIA plant 7296 · Inventory for Aug 2026.
| Generator | Technology | Status | Power (MW) | Energy (MWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | Operating | 123 | Unknown |
| 2-1 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | Operating | 181 | Unknown |
| 2-2 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | Operating | 180 | Unknown |
| 2-3 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | Operating | 206.5 | Unknown |
Similar plants ranked by technology, capacity, and distance.
Operating generator records and technology attributes reported through EIA-860.
| Generator | Capacity | Technology | Operation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 123 MW 89 MW summer | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine Natural Gas · GT | May 1995 | Operating |
| 2-1 | 181 MW 172.3 MW summer | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle Natural Gas · CT | Jun 2001 | Operating |
| 2-2 | 180 MW 175 MW summer | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle Natural Gas · CT | Jun 1997 | Operating |
| 2-3 | 206.5 MW 191 MW summer | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle Natural Gas · CA | Jun 2001 | Operating |
Monthly EIA generation history and recent market-resource behavior where linked telemetry is available.
Deterministic links to ERCOT market resources, price records, outage disclosures, queue records, and nearby infrastructure. Candidate joins remain labeled until corroborated.
Source-backed project transactions, agreements, land records, permits, and environmental disclosures. Portfolio and adjacent-project facts remain explicitly scoped.
Parties, market resources, and identifiers tied to this asset, with owner, operator, developer, EPC, compliance provider, and interconnecting entity roles kept separate.
Drag organizations to explore the network. Select a node to pin its details and available page link.
Project milestones and public references behind the asset profile.
EIA-860 lists generator 1 with this operating date.
Monthly generation is reported through EIA-923. Capacity factor uses the current EIA nameplate capacity and is shown only for complete calendar years.
| Largest reported plants | Capacity | State | |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Line Combined CycleCurrent | 690.5 MW | MO | |
| Empire Energy Center | 379 MW | MO | |
| Neosho Ridge Wind Energy Center | 301 MW | KS | |
| Riverton | 267.6 MW | KS | |
| Kings Point Wind Energy Center | 149.4 MW | MO | |
| North Fork Ridge Wind Energy Center | 149.4 MW | MO | |
| Ozark Beach | 16 MW | MO | |
| Prosperity Solar Farm CSG | 2.3 MW | MO |
Portfolio membership follows the latest EIA-860 reporting entity. It does not imply ultimate ownership.
View full reporting portfolioEIA-860 lists generator 2-2 with this operating date.
EIA-860 lists generator 2-1, generator 2-3 with this operating date.
The sale of Empire District Electric Company to Liberty Utilities was announced.
Answered from the published record above. Questions whose inputs this profile does not carry are omitted rather than estimated.
State Line Combined Cycle reports 690.5 MW natural gas of operating nameplate capacity. These technology ratings do not establish a common export limit. Source: EIA Aug 2026.
State Line Combined Cycle is a Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine, Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle facility in Jasper County, MO, participating in the SPP market.
State Line Combined Cycle is in Jasper County, MO, inside the SPP balancing area.
State Line Combined Cycle is operated by Empire District Electric Co according to the EIA generator inventory. Reporting membership does not by itself establish ultimate ownership.
State Line Combined Cycle reported 2,286.2 GWh over the twelve months to 2026-07. Figures are net generation as filed to EIA-923.
By capacity, State Line Combined Cycle ranks #277 of 540 operating plants of the same technology nationally. It ranks #2 of 5 in MO.
Plants within 25 km, nearest first, regardless of technology. Proximity is straight-line distance between mapped plant coordinates; it does not by itself establish a shared point of interconnection.