Free asset assessment
No cost · delivered by emailSee how the asset operated, where estimated gross revenue came from, and how dispatch compared with transparent baselines. Start with public market data; add operator data later for a reconciled view.
For battery owners, operators, investors, optimizers, lenders, and acquisition teams.
High-level intake first. Sensitive data is scoped separately.
Illustrative 100 MW / 200 MWh battery
$1.20m
Estimated gross market revenue · 30 days
75.0%
Observed / oracle
84.4%
Modeled / oracle
$150k
Modeled uplift
97.8%
Interval coverage
Illustrative example · not an observed asset or customer result
Inside the report
The output is designed to be reviewed: headline result, evidence, method, uncertainty, and the next data request all live in the same document.
Estimated gross revenue, market participation, data coverage, cycling, concentration, and the few events that explain the period.
A time-aligned view of price, charging, discharging, state of charge when available, and cumulative estimated gross revenue.
Observed dispatch beside a hold baseline, a transparent modeled strategy, and a perfect-foresight oracle that is explicitly an unattainable ceiling.
The intervals and operating constraints associated with the largest modeled gaps, without turning hindsight into a promise of achievable profit.
Source, vintage, settlement granularity, asset identity, efficiency, state-of-charge policy, exclusions, and every material coverage gap.
A concise PDF-style report plus machine-readable assumptions and interval outputs when the supplied data permits them.
Sample pages
Every value below is illustrative. It is not an observed asset, customer result, quote, or promise.
Illustrative 100 MW / 200 MWh battery
$1.20m
Estimated gross market revenue · 30 days
75.0%
Observed / oracle
84.4%
Modeled / oracle
$150k
Modeled uplift
97.8%
Interval coverage
Illustrative example · not an observed asset or customer result
Each comparison uses the same MW, MWh, efficiency, state-of-charge, and point-of-interconnection limits.
62%
38%
Illustrative example · not an observed asset or customer result
Methodology
A result without provenance is difficult to use and impossible to challenge. The report exposes the evidence, transformations, assumptions, and unresolved gaps that produced the answer.
Match the resource, settlement point, market interval, timezone, and reporting window before calculating a dollar.
Measure missing intervals, telemetry availability, grouping assumptions, and settlement compatibility so confidence follows the evidence.
Estimate observed gross market value from the best available dispatch and price data, then run each benchmark under the same MW, MWh, efficiency, state-of-charge, and point-of-interconnection constraints.
Use a perfect-foresight oracle only as a ceiling. Publication-aware or simple baselines carry the actionable comparison.
Energy and ancillary-service value are shown separately. No report claims full co-optimization unless the awards, deployments, prices, and model actually support it.
Show concentration, seasonal stability, data limitations, and the difference between a public reconstruction and an operator-verified settlement reconciliation.
Data ladder
The landing form asks only for enough context to establish coverage. Sensitive records move through a separately scoped handoff only when they materially change the report.
ISO, asset or resource name, settlement point if known, reporting period, MW, and duration.
Dispatch, state of charge, availability, outages, awards, and the physical limits used by the operator.
Settlement statements, fees, contracts, degradation, tolls, and O&M are required before an estimated gross reconstruction can become a reconciled net result.
Evidence boundary
Public-data reconstruction is estimated gross market revenue—not profit, a settlement statement, or investment advice.
The oracle is an unattainable hindsight ceiling, never a forecast or promised uplift.
Hedges, tolls, degradation, fees, and contract economics remain excluded unless supplied and explicitly reconciled.
Sensitive telemetry and settlements are not collected in this landing-page form; a secure data boundary is scoped separately.
Sources and precedent
Questions
Yes. The first version can be a clearly labeled public-data reconstruction. It estimates gross market value and operating behavior; it does not pretend to be the operator's settlement statement.
Operator telemetry, availability, awards, state of charge, and settlement records must be reconciled against the public reconstruction, with included and excluded costs listed.
No. It separates transparent, publication-aware benchmarks from a perfect-foresight ceiling and identifies data or operating constraints before calling any gap actionable.
ERCOT is the current public named-resource starting point. For PJM, CAISO, NYISO, or another market, operator dispatch or telemetry is required before we can reconstruct an individual battery's performance.
Request the assessment
Complete the high-level intake, confirm the request with a free account, and we will deliver the finished report to that verified email after the inputs have been reviewed.