What can this connection support—and what is that flexibility worth?

Screen visible capacity margin, model battery savings under the tariff, and see what evidence the next decision requires.

For industrial landlords, property owners, asset managers, large-load teams, and energy developers.

Get your free report

~2 min

Tell us which asset or site to assess. We will start with public records and only request private data if it would materially improve the result.

Street address, city, and state
Add details (optional)
If known
MW, if known
MW, if known
Private records are collected separately—do not paste telemetry, bills, settlements, or agreements here

We will deliver the report to your account email. By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy. Submitting this request does not launch an automated study.

The report, in three passes.

Establish the record. Test the counterfactual. State only what the evidence supports.

  1. 01

    Establish what the site supports

    Observed demand, contractual limits, battery charging demand, and unknowns kept separate.

    Resolve the property, utility, tariff, and service context; treat queue MW as context.

  2. 02

    Test what flexibility changes

    Peak shaving and eligible value streams under load, tariff, equipment, and battery limits.

    Reproduce the bill first, then dispatch within the site boundary without double counting.

  3. 03

    Show what moves to diligence

    Sensitivity, finance outputs, and the utility evidence required for the next decision.

    Separate observed, contractual, screened, and unknown values before calling anything verified.

Evidence sets the ceiling on the claim.

Public records establish the screen. Private operating evidence earns the stronger answer.

  1. 01

    Public screen

    Property, tariff, utility, and grid context.

    A preliminary site baseline.

  2. 02

    Private reconciliation

    Interval load, bills, service agreements, and operating plans.

    Modeled savings and contractual margin.

  3. 03

    Verified decision

    Equipment ratings, utility studies, and finance inputs.

    Decision-grade headroom and economics.

What the report will not claim.

  • Preliminary contractual margin is not verified system headroom.

  • Queue MW is context—not approved, deliverable, or site-owned capacity.

  • Export and ancillary value appear only with documented eligibility.

  • Parcel-level engineering requires site and utility evidence.

What teams usually ask.

Is the 7 MW difference between a 25 MW service limit and an 18 MW peak verified headroom?+

No. It is a preliminary contractual margin. Equipment, demand shape, export rights, feeder conditions, and utility review can change it.

Can you calculate savings from one utility bill?+

One bill supports a first screen. Interval load and a year of bills are needed for demand peaks, ratchets, and seasonality.

Does nearby interconnection queue capacity establish site rights?+

No. Queue records add context; they do not establish deliverability, property rights, or unused service capacity.

Sources carried into the report.